Today, I will be showing you some ungrammatical sentences people confidently make use of with the belief that these sentences are grammatical. It is even more appalling that these ungrammatical sentences are found in the works of some writers. If God can overlook in time of ignorance, who am I? Learning is a continuous process so I pray they stumble over this tutorial.
Some of these sentences are:
1. He HAS DRANK the water/ I HAVE DRANK the
water.
2. The national anthem WAS SANG by the choir
master.
3. I HAVE RANG the bell.
4. The battle HAS BEGAN/ The battle HAS just
BEGAN.
5. He HAS RAN.
6. Let the song BE SANG.
Each of the sentences above is ungrammatical
and the capitalized words are the cause of its ungrammaticality.
WHY ARE THEY UNGRAMMATICAL?
I will rather give you a simple remedy to
this menace than taking you through many explanations that will confuse you.
First, you should know that 'have, has, was,
is, be' are all auxiliary/helping verbs although they can also function as
lexical verbs. They precede lexical verbs in a sentence. For example:
He is risen.
She has come.
I have taken the book.
Let the book be taken from him.
Second, in any sentence you see a lexical
verb (except an -ing lexical verb, that is, the continuous tense of the lexical
verb) coming after any of the aforementioned auxiliary verbs, that lexical verb
should be in its past participle.
Examples: He is risen.
She has come.
I have taken the book.
In the sentences above, the lexical verbs
are in their past participle form because of the auxiliaries preceding them. To
further buttress this point, let's see the various tense forms of these lexical
verbs.
Present
tense. Past
tense. Past participle
Rise.
Rose.
Risen.
Come.
Came.
Come.
Take.
Took.
Taken.
Finally, if for any reason you use the past
tense of the lexical verb coming after any of these auxiliaries (has, have,
was, be, is), you have rendered the sentence ungrammatical. For example, if you
say, 'he is rose' instead of saying, 'he is risen," you have made an
ungrammatical sentence.
If you feel saying either 'he is rose' or
'she has came' is ungrammatical, why then do we say, 'The song was sang?'
Both 'He is rose' and 'She has came' are
wrong because the lexical verbs ('rose' and 'came') that are after the
auxiliaries ('is' and 'has') respectively, are in their past tense form.
Therefore, 'The song was sang' is considered ungrammatical because the lexical
verb (sang) which comes immediately after the auxiliary (was) is also in its
past tense form. Smiles. English is fun you know.
Having said that, let's now correct our
sentences of study:
1. He has drank the water/ I have drank the
water.
The right thing to say is------- He has
drunk the water/ I have drunk the water.
2. The national anthem was sang by the choir
master. (Wrong)
The national anthem was sung by the choir
master. (Correct)
3. I have rang the bell. (Wrong)
I have rung the bell.
(Correct)
4. The battle has just began. (Wrong)
The battle has just
begun. (Correct)
5. He has ran. (Wrong)
He has run. (Correct)
6.Let the song be sang. (Wrong)
Let the song be sung. (Correct)
In sum, a lexical verb (except its
continuous form) following any of the aforementioned auxiliary verbs should be
in its past participle, not in its past tense. Anything outside this is
ungrammatical.
Tags:
Tutorials